Transatlantic Information Sharing: At a Crossroads

Transatlantic Information Sharing: At a Crossroads

Jan 01, 2010

report

Transatlantic Information Sharing: At a Crossroads

 

January 2010

WASHINGTON — The attempted Christmas Day attack on a U.S. airliner has refocused interest on the data collected by governments on international travelers, and how information sharing can be used to prevent terrorism and secure travel if properly shared and analyzed. In the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, the United States and European Union worked out agreements to expand the sharing of personal information about international travelers as a means to prevent acts of terrorism and fight international crime.

However, as a new report - commissioned by the Heinrich Böll Stiftung North America and the Migration Policy Institute (MPI) - explores, negotiations on a binding international agreement that will govern the sharing of personal information for law enforcement purposes between the United States and the European Union, while high on the transatlantic policy agenda, face significant challenges.

Among them: Divergent institutional setups of U.S. and E.U. privacy agencies, conflicting views over how to guarantee privacy and personal data protection under different legal and institutional frameworks, and finding a common solution for the obligations of private companies to share information with governments.

The report "Transatlantic Information Sharing: At a Crossroads" describes and analyzes the legal, privacy and data protection frameworks for information-sharing agreements relating to human mobility that enable the United States and the European Union to share such information for law enforcement purposes. It also examines the various informal and formal channels through which the United States and the European Union have discussed their privacy and personal data protection concerns.

The report offers several recommendations, among them:
- The United States and the European Union should work toward negotiating a binding international agreement by setting up a roadmap that would help both sides lay out their goals and steps for diplomatic negotiations, while allowing relevant experts not involved in formal negotiations to offer their input.
- The U.S. government should consider establishing a central privacy office, helping assure European officials that the United States has an effective privacy watchdog.
- The United States and the European Union should update their respective privacy and personal data protection laws to reflect current security needs, and clearly define how those laws apply to citizens and noncitizens alike.
- The U.S. and E.U. governments should regularly provide public evaluations of the effectiveness of information-sharing agreements and the databases that collect and process information in stopping known or suspected terrorists and criminals from obtaining visas and entering their respective countries.

Please click here for the full report.

 
 

Related Articles

A Reasonable Expectation of Privacy? Data Protection in the United States and Germany. By Jim Harper and Axel Spies. AICGS Policy Report #22 (2006) with support of the Heinrich Böll Stiftung North America
 
 
 
 

0 Comments

Add new comment

Add new comment