TTIP and Fossil Fuel Subsidies: Using international policy processes as entry points for reform in the EU and the USA
Phasing out fossil fuels on both sides of the Atlantic would:
- create stronger price signals in favour of energy efficiency and low-carbon innovation;
- internalise at least some of the costs of FFS and thus reduce market distortions;
- bring about a shift towards low-carbon enerfy and thus boost employment in the renewable energy sector;
- bring about GHG emissions reductions in the US and the EU;
- could contribute to reducing budget deficits with the least possible negative impact on growth and employment.
Within the TTIP process, a possible model for reform could be:
- Get FFS reform on the negotiation agenda, e.g. through the TTIP Advisory Group
- Agree national reporting processes - develop a detailed template for all countries to identify and quantify FFS within a transparent framework;
- Cost-benefit analysis of FFS reform, estimate distributional impacts;
- Develop a coherent reform policy on the basis of 2 and 3;
- Build support with a good communications strategy and disseminate information about pricing reforms before they are introduced;
- Set up an independent body to assess progress and deal with legal questions.